<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Flying Thumbs Web Design &#187; youtube</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flyingthumbs.com/tag/youtube/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flyingthumbs.com</link>
	<description>Search Engine Friendly xhtml/css Web Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 04:52:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-beta1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>YouTube&#8217;s automated captioning falls on deaf ears</title>
		<link>http://www.flyingthumbs.com/2009/11/youtubes-automated-captioning-falls-on-deaf-ears/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flyingthumbs.com/2009/11/youtubes-automated-captioning-falls-on-deaf-ears/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[accessibility]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[captioning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyingthumbs.com/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several months ago, Google implemented captioning into their video service, YouTube. All you needed was a transcript, formatted in timed text and that was it. The most difficult thing about this process was making the special timed text file. So&#160;&#8230; <a href="http://www.flyingthumbs.com/2009/11/youtubes-automated-captioning-falls-on-deaf-ears/">Continue&#160;reading&#160;<span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several months ago, Google implemented captioning into their video service, YouTube. All you needed was a transcript, formatted in timed text and that was it. The most difficult thing about this process was making the special timed text file. So Google did away with that&#8230;</p>
<p>All you need now, is a transcript and Google&#8217;s automatic speech recognition (ASR) software will create the timed text for you. Not only will this help with accessibility, but SEO as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flyingthumbs.com/2009/11/youtubes-automated-captioning-falls-on-deaf-ears/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>High-Quality (HQ) Video on YouTube</title>
		<link>http://www.flyingthumbs.com/2009/07/high-quality-video-on-youtube-hq-and-captions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flyingthumbs.com/2009/07/high-quality-video-on-youtube-hq-and-captions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:46:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jeff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[youtube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flyingthumbs.com/?p=3</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[About six months ago YouTube gave their viewers the option to see videos in high-quality or as they call it, &#8220;HQ.&#8221; This is wonderful news for anyone who always liked YouTube but did not like the loss of quality of&#160;&#8230; <a href="http://www.flyingthumbs.com/2009/07/high-quality-video-on-youtube-hq-and-captions/">Continue&#160;reading&#160;<span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About six months ago YouTube gave their viewers the option to see videos in high-quality or as they call it, &#8220;HQ.&#8221; This is wonderful news for anyone who always liked YouTube but did not like the loss of quality of videos. Not to be confused with high-definition (HD) this new format can be switched from normal view with a click of a button.</p>
<div id="attachment_21" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 206px"><img class="size-full wp-image-21" title="youtube-hq" src="http://www.flyingthumbs.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/youtube-hq.jpg" alt="high quality in youtube" width="196" height="114" /><p class="wp-caption-text">high quality button in youtube allows users to switch between HQ and normal.</p></div>
<p>Colleagues have said they don&#8217;t notice much of a difference, but I can if I watch closely. It also seems to very depending on the video. Perhaps reflecting the quality of the original video? There is a subtle difference. Let&#8217;s examine a side by side comparison:</p>
<div id="attachment_22" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 574px"><img class="size-full wp-image-22" title="youtube-comparison" src="http://www.flyingthumbs.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/youtube-comparison.jpg" alt="side by side comparison" width="564" height="357" /><p class="wp-caption-text">side by side comparison</p></div>
<p>Clearly in this example there is a difference in quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flyingthumbs.com/2009/07/high-quality-video-on-youtube-hq-and-captions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
